Updating stats...
WHO IS BETTER?
Based on the last 15 matches · Updated every 24h
Recent Matches
Kellington
vedráMs
Comparative Profile
Stats comparison
Winrate
Kellington
219 matches
vedráMs
185 matches
Combat
Multi-kills (total)
Objectives
Vision control
Teamwork
Economy & Durability
Consistency
Higher score = more stable performance
Early vs Late Game
Early Game
Late Game
Trends
Role distribution
Kellington
vedráMs
Head-to-Head
No shared champions in their recent matches
Most played champions
Based on the last 15 ranked matches
Kellington
Neeko
6 matches
66.7%
10.3/6.5/6
Seraphine
2 matches
100%
4/4.5/15
Mel
1 match
0%
13/9/6
Lux
1 match
0%
3/9/1
Blitzcrank
1 match
0%
4/8/7
vedráMs
Viktor
8 matches
50%
6.3/5.9/8.3
Malzahar
2 matches
100%
5/5/12.5
Orianna
2 matches
50%
7/4.5/6.5
Corki
1 match
0%
12/7/7
Veigar
1 match
0%
11/9/8
Fun Facts
Kellington
- ★Undefeated with Seraphine (2 games)
- ★Main Neeko (6 games, 66.7% WR)
- ★7 solo kills in a game with Mel
- ★First Blood in 5 of 15 games
vedráMs
- ★Undefeated with Malzahar (2 games)
- ★Best game: 10/2/3 with Viktor
- ★Main Viktor (8 games, 50% WR)
- ★7 solo kills in a game with Viktor
Outperforms Kellington in 4 of 6 statistical categories analyzed from the last 15 Solo/Duo Queue matches.
vedráMs secures the advantage by leading in 4 out of 6 categories, including a significant +2.80 CS/min and +295 damage per minute. While Kellington shows better map awareness with +15.20 vision score and a +1.40% winrate, the statistical gap in combat efficiency is substantial. The Master I ranking of vedráMs reflects a higher level of play compared to Silver II, supported by superior kill participation and KDA.
Stats are role-normalized for fair cross-position comparisons
ELITE TIER MECHANICAL SUPERIORITY
MACRO AND RESOURCE GAP
New Comparison
Instant results