WHO IS BETTER?
Based on the last 15 matches · Updated every 24h
WIB Rating
Rookie·0 WIBRRookie·0 WIBRRecent Matches
MilimNava
Komodo 3000
Comparative Profile
Stats comparison
Winrate
MilimNava
24 matches
Komodo 3000
22 matches
Combat
Multi-kills (total)
Objectives
Vision control
Teamwork
Economy & Durability
Consistency
Higher score = more stable performance
Early vs Late Game
Early Game
Late Game
Trends
Role distribution
MilimNava
Komodo 3000
Head-to-Head
0.67 KDA
0% WR
1 game
4.00 KDA
50% WR
2 games
Most played champions
Based on the last 15 ranked matches
MilimNava
Poppy
10 matches
70%
5.4/4/6.9
Ahri
1 match
0%
1/1/0
Lux
1 match
0%
0/6/4
Annie
1 match
100%
6/2/5
Gwen
1 match
0%
6/8/4
Komodo 3000
Garen
3 matches
33.3%
4.3/5/5
Lux
2 matches
50%
1.5/2.5/8.5
Mel
2 matches
50%
8/8.5/13
Lulu
2 matches
100%
0.5/3.5/23.5
Jinx
1 match
0%
9/7/5
Fun Facts
MilimNava
- ★Best game: 15/4/11 with Poppy
- ★Main Poppy (10 games, 70% WR)
- ★4 solo kills in a game with Poppy
Komodo 3000
- ★Undefeated with Lulu (2 games)
Outperforms Komodo 3000 in 4 of 6 statistical categories analyzed from the last 15 Solo/Duo Queue matches.
MilimNava wins the comparison by leading in four out of six categories, including a +0.65 higher KDA and +163 damage per minute. While Komodo 3000 shows better team utility with +39.30 vision score and +10.20% kill participation, MilimNava maintains a 4.90% higher winrate and superior resource management with +2.50 CS per minute.
Stats are role-normalized for fair cross-position comparisons
SUPERIOR INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE
ENHANCE PERSONAL IMPACT