WHO IS BETTER?
Based on the last 15 matches · Updated every 24h
WIB Rating
Rookie·0 WIBRRookie·53 WIBRRecent Matches
Next level NL
Centella a 1000
Comparative Profile
Stats comparison
Winrate
Next level NL
0 matches
Centella a 1000
40 matches
Combat
Multi-kills (total)
Objectives
Vision control
Teamwork
Economy & Durability
Consistency
Higher score = more stable performance
Early vs Late Game
Early Game
Late Game
Trends
Role distribution
Next level NL
Centella a 1000
Head-to-Head
No shared champions in their recent matches
Most played champions
Based on the last 15 ranked matches
Next level NL
Shen
3 matches
0%
1/5/2
Rakan
2 matches
100%
7/3.5/3.5
Viktor
2 matches
50%
4.5/5.5/7.5
Sett
2 matches
100%
6/5/3.5
Kayn
2 matches
50%
11/13.5/11
Centella a 1000
Ashe
4 matches
75%
3.5/4/7.8
Taric
4 matches
25%
0.3/6.5/13
Lucian
3 matches
66.7%
3.7/5/9.3
Fiora
1 match
0%
5/6/3
Syndra
1 match
100%
6/3/13
Fun Facts
Next level NL
- ★1 perfect game(s) (0 deaths and victory)
- ★Undefeated with Rakan (2 games)
- ★5 solo kills in a game with Rakan
Centella a 1000
- ★1 perfect game(s) (0 deaths and victory)
- ★Best game: 11/2/13 with Swain
Outperforms Next level NL in 5 of 6 statistical categories analyzed from the last 15 Solo/Duo Queue matches.
Centella a 1000 dominates the comparison by winning five out of six categories, including a +1.06 KDA lead and a +13.50 vision score advantage. While Next level NL deals 83 more damage per minute, Centella a 1000 secures a 47.50% higher winrate and 15.40% more kill participation. The data reflects a more balanced performance across vision, farming, and team contribution from the Emerald II player.
Stats are role-normalized for fair cross-position comparisons
SUPERIOR MACRO AND CONSISTENCY
LACK OF OBJECTIVE IMPACT