WHO IS BETTER?
Based on the last 15 matches · Updated every 24h
WIB Rating
Rookie·0 WIBRRookie·24 WIBRRecent Matches
Ząd 99
flaviviridaE
Comparative Profile
Stats comparison
Winrate
Ząd 99
0 matches
flaviviridaE
0 matches
Combat
Multi-kills (total)
Objectives
Vision control
Teamwork
Economy & Durability
Consistency
Higher score = more stable performance
Early vs Late Game
Early Game
Late Game
Trends
Role distribution
Ząd 99
flaviviridaE
Head-to-Head
2.36 KDA
40% WR
10 games
3.37 KDA
75% WR
4 games
11.00 KDA
100% WR
1 game
2.45 KDA
50% WR
2 games
Most played champions
Based on the last 15 ranked matches
Ząd 99
Zed
10 matches
40%
8.9/5.8/4.8
Akali
1 match
0%
10/4/2
Cassiopeia
1 match
0%
5/9/10
LeBlanc
1 match
100%
3/1/8
Irelia
1 match
0%
2/10/1
flaviviridaE
Zed
4 matches
75%
10/4.8/6
Lee Sin
3 matches
0%
7/10.7/5.3
Diana
2 matches
50%
6.5/13/10
LeBlanc
2 matches
50%
8.5/5.5/5
Ahri
2 matches
0%
10.5/7.5/8
Fun Facts
Ząd 99
- ★Main Zed (10 games, 40% WR)
- ★4 solo kills in a game with Akali
flaviviridaE
- ★1 perfect game(s) (0 deaths and victory)
- ★Best game: 10/2/3 with Leblanc
- ★6 solo kills in a game with Akali
Outperforms Ząd 99 in 3 of 6 statistical categories analyzed from the last 15 Solo/Duo Queue matches.
flaviviridaE secures the advantage through superior combat impact, leading with +4.40% kill participation and +48 damage per minute. While Ząd 99 shows better laning discipline with +0.40 CS/min and +2.70 vision score, flaviviridaE displays higher champion mastery with a 75% winrate on Zed.
Stats are role-normalized for fair cross-position comparisons
FLAVIVIRIDAE: IMPACT AND EFFICIENCY
ZĄD 99: PASSIVE FUNDAMENTALS