WHO IS BETTER?
Based on the last 15 matches · Updated every 24h
WIB Rating
Rookie·0 WIBR
Contender·117 WIBRRecent Matches
invoscar
MGC xPepe
Comparative Profile
Stats comparison
Winrate
invoscar
22 matches
MGC xPepe
8 matches
Combat
Multi-kills (total)
Objectives
Vision control
Teamwork
Economy & Durability
Consistency
Higher score = more stable performance
Early vs Late Game
Early Game
Late Game
Trends
Role distribution
invoscar
MGC xPepe
Head-to-Head
No shared champions in their recent matches
Most played champions
Based on the last 15 ranked matches
invoscar
Ziggs
5 matches
60%
6.6/6.8/9.4
Zyra
2 matches
100%
3.5/6/11.5
Jinx
2 matches
50%
5.5/3.5/9
Miss Fortune
1 match
100%
15/4/3
Neeko
1 match
100%
5/8/15
MGC xPepe
Morgana
3 matches
100%
1.7/5.7/19
Ezreal
2 matches
50%
12/5.5/6.5
Karthus
2 matches
100%
11.5/11.5/15.5
Anivia
1 match
0%
4/6/8
Veigar
1 match
0%
11/9/9
Fun Facts
invoscar
- ★Undefeated with Zyra (2 games)
- ★Main Ziggs (5 games, 60% WR)
MGC xPepe
- ★Got 1 Quadrakill(s)
- ★Undefeated with Morgana (3 games)
Outperforms invoscar in 4 of 6 statistical categories analyzed from the last 15 Solo/Duo Queue matches.
MGC xPepe wins four out of six categories, showing higher combat efficiency with a +0.27 KDA and +10.50% kill participation. While invoscar holds a significant +25% winrate advantage and +5.20 vision score, MGC xPepe leads in damage per minute and objective participation. The data indicates MGC xPepe has a stronger individual statistical impact despite the lower rank.
Stats are role-normalized for fair cross-position comparisons
MGC XPEPE STATISTICAL DOMINANCE
INVOSCAR WINRATE AND VISION
New Comparison
Instant results